도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 8, 2015, the Defendant was punished by a fine not exceeding one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, which was committed by a person using a means of water source on January 8, 2015.
On October 15, 2020, the Defendant driven D low-income motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.053% at a distance of about 11:00 meters for the same day from the Do in front of Dongdaemun-gu B, Seoyang-gu to the front road of the same Gu in about 10km for the same day.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (Prohibition of Driving under the influence of alcohol) more than twice.
2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car.
On October 15, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.053% among blood transfusions on October 15, 2020, while driving the said car, and driving the road of five-lanes in the front direction of Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul along the two-lanes along the original direction.
In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to operate the motor vehicle safely and prevent accidents in advance.
Defendant 1 was negligent in performing the duty of care as seen above while neglecting the duty of care, and was negligent in performing the duty of care, and received the back spread of the Victim E’s F QM6 car stopping in accordance with the signals of signal, etc. in front of the direction of the course.
Due to the shock, the above QM6 car was pushed in the future, and the victim's HG car was parked in front of the direction of the proceeding.
As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence by the victim E and the above QM6 car injury, such as the victim I, the victim G and the victim J who was on board the passenger car, respectively, for about two weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's person;