2. The court below decided the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. The defendant was under the order of the crime of this case, agreed with the victim and the victim, and should consider equality in the case of the judgment at the same time as the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive, and from the defendant who is preparing a sanatorium for the elderly, the defendant's punishment on the grounds favorable to the judgment of the court below seems to have been sufficiently taken into account when he was sentenced to punishment at the court below. In light of the fact that the defendant had the power to be subject to criminal punishment several times by fraud, the judgment of the court below is too excessive to determine the punishment of the court below and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

shall not be appointed by a person.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.