The sentencing of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case, and the fact that the amount of damage of this case is not relatively large, etc., that is favorable to the Defendant, or did not reach an agreement with the victims, or that the Defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been subject to criminal punishment 36 times in total, including the past record of punishment 32 times as the same crime, and that the Defendant committed the crime of this case in addition, taking into account the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, and other various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, it is not deemed unfair for the

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition