If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, from around 16:00 on June 18, 2014 to 16:30 on the same day, expressed that “E” company of the victim D’s second floor in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, was unable to receive wages from the victim, and thus, obstructed the victim’s business operation by force over about 30 minutes of the victim’s business, such as: (a) the Defendant’s desire to “the spacte is dead, dead, and dead; and (b) the spacter is unable to enter into a contract with the customer operator who visited the victim’s company; and (c) the Defendant was unable to receive wages from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the fourth trial date);

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. To cut off on-site CCTV and apply the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant statutory provisions on criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the selection of fines (to select fines, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the commission of a crime resulting in the failure of the defendant to receive wages; (b) the victim, who wants the Defendant’s prior wife to the Defendant in this court; (c) the recognition of and reflects the error; and (d) the absence of any history of punishment for the last seven years or longer; and (b) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;