beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.22 2017누85599

요양급여부지급처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. An application for change of the purport and cause of the claim filed by the Plaintiff in this court.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

In the process of litigation, from July 10, 2010 to May 9, 2012, the Plaintiff served as a facility engineer at the advanced feed B’s institute disaster prevention office from December 3, 2012. Until December 31, 2013, the Plaintiff was dispatched to the above workplace under the control of public interest development company until December 31, 2013, and from January 1, 2014.

On April 23, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the D Hospital on April 28, 2015. The Plaintiff was diagnosed at the same hospital on April 28, 2015 as “(i) the post-protruding escape certificate No. 1-2; (ii) the post-protruding escape certificate No. 4-5; (iii) the post-protruding escape certificate No. 5, and (iv) the post-protruding disc stebrate (hereinafter the above disease), respectively. After that, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the Defendant on May 7, 2015, at the time of the work of the advanced feed B agency, the Defendant was treated for the first time on April 12, 2012; (iv) the Plaintiff was employed for a company on December 3, 2012, and was living for development of the right bridge, such as the symptoms of a satch.

The application for medical care benefits (hereinafter referred to as the “application of this case”) was filed by asserting that it is “the cause of the disaster attached to the application of the above medical care benefits and the situation of the occurrence” are as follows:

On April 21, 201, while an advanced feed B agency in the form of daily work for transporting and delivering feed, the left issue of the feed delivery vehicle's loading on April 21, 201, which is vadi, has been defined to the outside, and vadi, has been defined to the outside, but vadi has been defined to the outside, and on May 201, there was an accident that goes beyond the stairs for the first instance trial of the police officer. On October 201, 201, while he was in the form of daily work for the delivery of feed, he was faced with a strong power to flow down the feed under the shoulder.