However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 2, 2015, the Defendant is a foreigner of the kar Switzerland’s nationality who entered the Republic of Korea with a visa (H-2) for visiting employment on May 2, 2015.

피고인은 2015. 4. 22. 경 키 르기 스스 탄 비쉬 켁 아크 훈 바 예 브 35 번가에 있는 키 르기 스스 탄 대한민국 대사관에서, 일명 ‘C’ 라는 브로커에게 5,500 달러를 주기로 하고, 사실 피고인의 어머니가 이른바 ‘ 고려 인’ 의 후손이 아닌데도 ‘ 고려 인’ 인 것처럼 위조된 출생 증명서를 ‘C ’로부터 교부 받은 다음, 사증 발급 신청서를 제출하면서 위와 같이 위조된 허위 출생 증명서를 첨부 서류로 제출하여, 부모의 일방 또는 조부모의 일방이 대한민국의 국적을 보유하였던 경우에 발급되는 방문 취업 (H-2) 사증을 발급 받았다.

Accordingly, in collusion with “C”, the Defendant applied for a visa in collusion with “C” at the same time as interfering with the legitimate performance of duties by a public official in charge of issuing visas belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application for visa issuance, etc.;

1. Status of individual entry or departure;

1. A copy of a forged birth certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation an immigration offender at the request of an investigative agency;

1. Articles 137 and 30 (Interference with the performance of official duties by fraudulent means) of the Criminal Act relevant to the crime, Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 7-2 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., reflectiveness, motive of crimes, criminal records, etc.);