2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The reasoning for this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this case is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The plaintiff asserts to the purport that in the trial of a party, the status as a member of a specific social group is likely to be boomed, and that the status should be recognized as a refugee since there is no possibility of being protected by the government, etc. of Uzbekistan, which is a nationality country.

However, the plaintiff did not submit all data supporting his/her claim in addition to the notice of disposition by the Ministry of Justice or the domestic press news at the first instance and the second instance court.

In addition, even if the plaintiff's assertion is considered, it can not be seen that the specific imminent situation was revealed to the extent that it can be used as the basis for recognition of refugee status, and it is not reasonable and persuasive.

According to this, the plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.