beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.23 2018나45022

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a juristic person established by A Fund Act for the purpose of facilitating corporate financing by guaranteeing the debt of an enterprise which lacks security capacity and thereby facilitating its own financing. 2) D is a representative director of C of a stock company established for the purpose of clothes and new retail business.

3) On July 11, 201, the Defendant is a person working as a employee of C, and D has completed business registration with the trade name lending the Defendant’s name. (B2B) The E-Commerce (E-Commerce) loan system was established to reduce the settlement risk of a sales company due to credit transaction in accordance with the government’s policies for improvement of the bill system and to alleviate the financial shortage of the sales company. If a purchasing enterprise (original company) purchases goods from a sales company, etc., the financial institution that received the guarantee certificate of A Fund paid the purchase price for the goods immediately, based on evidential documents, such as tax invoices received through electronic commerce brokerage (B2B) within the lending limit under this guarantee certificate, and the purchasing enterprise pays the purchase price to the financial institution. (c) On June 25, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the FF bank and the payment settlement agreement (B200,500,000 won, 200,000 won and 300,000 won, 300.

2. On March 21, 2012, the Defendant entered into an agreement with the F Bank to use the F Bank for the settlement of corporate purchase funds B2B, and submitted the F Bank the business account in the name of the Defendant, its business registration certificate, its certificate of personal seal impression, passport copy, etc.

D-.