교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 1072"
1. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant was driving a Category CN city car without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 6.1km from May 26, 2017 to the front road of the branch university of the same city, which is located in the 427 west-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, which is located in the 427 west-si.
2. On June 27, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, from the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court, due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and from the same support on November 25, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for the same crime.
On May 26, 2017, the Defendant driven a CNA-si car in the state of alcohol alcohol content of 0.071%, while under the influence of alcohol at approximately one meter from the front road of the main road of the 83rd University at the Hanwon-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do.
As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.
3. The defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaged in driving of the said car.
At the time set forth in paragraph 2, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as above, and continued to drive the road front of the main road of the Superior University located in 83, the Hanwon-si, Gangwon-do.
Since there was a road within the university premises, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to take the front, rear, left, and right and right of the motor vehicle, and to operate the steering and brakes accurately and safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence, which led to a failure to see the rear side while under the influence of alcohol, led to a shock of the body part of the victim D(27) who walked behind the car by the Defendant, following the vehicle driven by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.