The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly adopted by the court below and the first instance court, it is just to find the Defendants guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to “the act of changing the form and quality of land for farming” under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. Thus, the argument that the determination of a sentence is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the Defendants.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.