At the time, it was night and located near a street crossing, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a motor vehicle travelling around by checking the front, rear, and right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to safely proceed so as to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left as it is, due to negligence of the Defendant, received the part front of the Defendant’s car left side of the passenger car by driving GCA110S engine that was going to the KS6 U.S. military unit from the right side of the Pyeongtaek gate 16 U.S. unit on the right side of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim, such as cutting off the right-side executives who need approximately 21 weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the bicycle, which is the victim H, to be repaired in KRW 905,000.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

B. Grounds for dismissing a public prosecution: The main text of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (in the event of an accident that does not apply to the comprehensive automobile insurance covered by the automobile insurance, however, the defense counsel was indicted on the premise that the comprehensive automobile insurance covered by the automobile insurance, but based on the defense counsel’s proof of subscription to the automobile insurance, which is the automobile insurance unit of the Korea-Japan Nonlife Insurance Co., Ltd. issued on July 5,

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act;