beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.14 2014고단6471

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 500,000 won.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) at around 14:00 on June 15, 2013, at the mutual influenite conference located in the territory of Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) the victim C (35 years old) who was fluored only at the age club on the preceding day and fluort this shower; (c) the Defendant: (d) was holding a 100,000 won check issued by a national bank, which was located in the victim’s bank; and (d) Chapter 2

In addition, they stolen them.

2. Violation of the Act on the Control of Illegal Trees, and whether the Defendant stolen the check as above and stolen the check from the above C

As the phone calls referred to the purport that “the check was received,” the check was thought to be unable to be used normally, and was used to alter the check number.

Accordingly, on June 2013, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the F, F, 307, and Chacker F, and Chacker’s knife, the printing part of “D” portion of “D” 6 in the last number of “D” checks (Evidence No. 1) was flifed as “0” in a flife, and flife the printing part of “E” number No. 2 of “E” checks (Evidence No. 2).

As a result, the Defendant modified two copies of one’s own check for the purpose of exercising the right, and, around 12:00 on June 25, 2013, issued two copies of the altered check to G in charge of the above studio-management in front of the 307 studio-management at the above 307 studio and exercised it respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of forged checks and report on investigation (written confirmation as to forgery of forged checks);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 5 of the Control of Illegal Check Act, Articles 217 and 214 (1) of the Criminal Act (abundance of checks) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (an alteration due to the issuance of a check number D, each of which is heavier than that of securities, is set forth in the crime of attempted securities.