A. The punishment of the defendant (4 months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine both the judgment and the prosecutor’s unfair claims for sentencing.

The court below seems to have sentenced the defendant to a punishment by taking into account the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has led to the confession of all crimes and reflects against the victim, and that the injured person has not been punished by the defendant due to the smooth agreement with the victim, that the defendant again committed the crime during the same repeated crime period, and that the degree of injury is not minor.

When comprehensively considering the motive, circumstance, result, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, record of punishment, etc. in the trial of the political party, as well as the matters under the conditions of sentencing, including the punishment, the judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion.

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

Therefore, we cannot accept all the argument that the sentencing of the defendant and the prosecutor is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.