For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the part of interfering with business and entering the structure of the instant facts charged on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but did not state specific grounds for objection in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.