교원소청심사위원회결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the reasons are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[The first instance court's dismissal disposition in this case is reasonable in light of the circumstances in its holding, since it is reasonable to see that the dismissal disposition in this case was excessively excessive compared to the level of the intervenor's misconduct and thus, the defendant's judgment in this case is justifiable.
“The Plaintiff dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds stated in its reasoning. The Plaintiff basically repeats the same argument in the first instance court. Thus, even if the Plaintiff considered some complementary arguments and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and examined them closely by comparing them with the records, the first instance judgment is still justifiable.”
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.