except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 24, 2014, the Defendant prepared a false statement of complaint against the persons with the intention of having them receive criminal punishment from D and E at the bar office on the false name in Jeju city.

A written complaint was that "the complainant was employed as a public official in charge of Jeju viewing F and applied for the reinstatement on or around May 2008 when he/she had been employed as a cerebrovascular and was disposed of on or around March 2012 while serving as a public official in charge of Jeju Viewing, but D and E, the main Ger of Jeju Viewers, applied for the reinstatement, but they were punished because they forged the application document under the name of the complainant and caused the complainant to retire as if the complainant applied for the voluntary retirement around that time."

However, in fact, at the time of the expiration of the period of leave of absence under the Local Public Officials Act, the Defendant was unable to be reinstated in light of the Defendant’s health condition, and therefore, the Defendant was recommended to apply for leave of absence more favorable than ex officio dismissal and prepared and submitted by himself/herself, and at the same time, he/she was recognized as special promotion around April 20, 2012 and received approximately KRW 85 million as the honorary retirement allowance from the Jeju Viewers, and around May 10, 2012, he/she received approximately KRW 85 million as the honorary retirement allowance from the Jeju Viewers and received retirement allowance and retirement pension by himself/herself from the Public Officials Pension Corporation around May 10, 2012.

On November 24, 2014, the Defendant submitted a complaint stating the aforementioned false details to the officials in charge at the civil service offices of the Jeju District Prosecutors' Office, and around December 10, 2014, the Defendant made a supplementary statement at the investigation office of the Jeju East Police Station and the office of the Jeju Police Station and made a supplementary statement to the complainant, and D and E did not comply.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. An application for payment of reinstatement, honorary retirement, or honorary retirement allowances of local public officials;

1. Application of the duplicate, disbursement resolution, and receipt Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 156 of the Criminal Act;