When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 12, 2016, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim C’s operation D located in the north-gu Office of Port B from the French on March 12, 2016, and would pay the victim all by settling the work cost on March 24, 2016, when sending the scar to the victim at the railroad construction site from March 12, 2016 to March 24, 2016.

“.......”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the defendant with the work cost of cateral equipment.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay 2.2 million won working expenses to the victim and did not pay the victim with the equipment from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A certificate for equipment operation;

1. Tax invoice;

1. (States) Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing certificates of all registered ethyl content;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;