개발제한구역의지정및관리에관한특별조치법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On January 8, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 for a violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Establishment and Management of Areas subject to Development Restriction in the Government Support of the Seoul District Court, and on November 10, 2014, issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 for the same crime at the Cheongbu District Court. On March 31, 2016, the same court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5,00,000 for a violation of the Food Sanitation Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 16, 2016.
[Criminal facts]
1. Any person who intends to construct a building, alter the purpose of use, install a structure, change the form and quality of land, etc. within a development-restricted zone, or a water source protection zone, shall obtain permission from the competent authority;
The Defendant, while illegally operating the “E” in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, a water source protection area with interest on the development restriction zone, had the intent to hold a group for the above “Kaf E” in the above “Kaf E” owned by the Defendant.
Accordingly, on April 2014, the Defendant changed the form and quality of land by planting turfs with a size of 289 square meters from F to F for profit without obtaining permission from the competent authorities, and from that to April 2016, the Defendant changed the use of the building on eight occasions in the interest source protection area of the development restriction zone, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and installed the structure, and changed the form and quality of the land.
2. Any person who intends to run a food entertainment business in violation of the Food Sanitation Act shall report to the competent authority by type of business or place of business;
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not report to the competent authorities on July 9, 2016 to November 8, 2016, with the trade name “Kaf E” and “Kaf E,” and had all business facilities, including four, eight, eight, eight, and nine, a set of 4, eight, and a set of 1,8, and two, a coffee machine, and two, an unspecified person.