If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On February 24, 2016, at around 00:15, the Defendant argued that a new bank Boba Baba in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1 is a trial expense. On the street, the Defendant was in the dispute between B and siba in the street, and the victim D, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report, and the victim B, who was a slope belonging to the Seoul Police Station, was in the presence of the E and four other persons, to arrest the victim D as a current offender.

B. Badrhh shot, which is the larger bruth of this brush, brushed, brushed, brushed once by hand the victim D’s brush, and brushed the victim B who prevented the brush, with the prush, “this brush, brush, and brut it.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting the victims, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, D, B, or E;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (opportune selection) and Article 31 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (opportune selection);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 57 of the Criminal Act including the number of days of detention in prison;