However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 5. 8. 23:20 경 고양 시 덕양구 C 건물 401호 피고인의 주거지에서 D이 밤늦게 피고인의 아내인 E에게 전화를 하였다는 이유로 말다툼을 하다가 화가 나 위 D에게 칼을 보여주며 겁을 줘야겠다고 마음 먹고, 2016. 5. 9. 01:30 경 위 주거지에 있던 부엌칼( 증 제 1호, 칼날 길이 16cm, 총길이 27cm) 을 소지한 채 고양시 덕양구 소원로 114에 있는 행신 역으로 D을 만나러 갔으나 만나지 못하자, 위 행 신역 앞에서 F가 운전하는 G 택시에 승차한 후 위 부엌칼을 소지하고 “ 한국 사람들 다 똘 아이 새끼다,

The kitchen knick, which is a dangerous object that might be used by violence without any justifiable reason, such as the term "new, dead, etc.", was carried with the kitchen knick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, E, F, and D;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 7 of the relevant Act and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (A prosecutor sought confiscation of one kitchen knife (No. 1) which is seized, but according to the records of this case, the kitchen knife is owned by E and H, or owned by them and the defendant jointly;

Therefore, it does not constitute “cases that do not belong to a person other than the criminal” as stipulated in Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act, and it does not constitute confiscation.

Considering the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing is against the defendant, that there are circumstances to consider the background of the crime of this case, and that there is no record of criminal punishment in Korea.