However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 29, 2016, at around 23:45, the Defendant: (a) received a report of assaulting D at C amusement stations located in Chungcheongnam-dong B, Chungcheongnam-dong; and (b) arrested the Defendant as the current offender from the slopeF, etc., and one other, assigned to the Dong-dong Police Station E box.

The Defendant, at around 00:20 on January 30, 2016, at the E box located in Chungcheongnam-dong G, Chungcheongnam-dong G, the Defendant was asked F of questions from F to ascertain the circumstances of the instant charges, whether the “Chewing, Chewing, and democratic police officers” are in this shape;

In order to collect evidence, F was on board the box box boxr who tried to photograph the knife of a knife with a knife with a knife.

The TV ocons with TV ocons, and assaulted F by getting the left hand of F one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases and investigation of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution.

1. The scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [type determination] None of the types 1 (Interference with and Compelling of the performance of official duties) (the area of recommendation and sentence] (the area of recommendation and sentence), the basic area of punishment between six months and one year and four months;

2. In the event that the defendant who was sentenced to the sentence was arrested for a flagrant offender on the suspicion of assault, the police officer who was in charge of the investigation took a bath and assault to obstruct the legitimate execution of official duties.

Since the crime of interference with the execution of public duties is a crime that undermines the function of the state by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority, there is a need for strict punishment to establish national legal order and eradicate the light of public authority.

The defendant has already been punished for violence-related crimes.

On the other hand, however, the defendant has the time to commit the crime of this case.