Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On September 12:55, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed that is not clear from the side of the volume to the dead acid, at the entrance of a new village at the time of Kim Jong-si, at which the 1st line of the entrance of the new village at the time of the maintenance of the volume of the car was driven by the Defendant.

Since there was a long distance, there was a duty of care for the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to reduce speed, to check the safety of the course by checking well the right and the right of the front side of the motor vehicle, and to drive the motor vehicle safely to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not look at the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and did not discover the e-mail of the victim D(66 years of age) driving on a Mad-ri distance by negligence going through without neglecting to set a speed, and did not discover the e-mail of the victim's Mad-(66 years of age) and shocked the left side of the Mad-ri.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by his occupational negligence during the course of carrying the victim to the G hospital emergency room in Kim Jong-si, at around 13:15 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A survey report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, the scene of a traffic accident, and photographs of victims;

1. Notification of comprehensive traffic accident analysis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a written autopsy;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. It shall be sentenced to the same sentence as the order in consideration of the following reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act:

- Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of negligence and the result of the death of the injured party on the wind which has been negligent in performing the duty of charging attention while operating a motor vehicle at a rapid speed; the degree of the fault and the degree of the consequence thereof; the circumstances favorable: there are no significant criminal records exceeding the fine; the fact that the injured party has agreed with the bereaved family members; and the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance