beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.04.13 2013고단3205

사기

Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim E company is a person who served as an insurance designer in the victim E company (hereinafter “victim company”) as an insurance agent from August 2010 to May 201, which is an insurance agency run by F.

On November 10, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the damaged company located in Ansan-si G, the Defendant: (b) prepared an offer to the victimized company, as if the H were to normally buy three health asset transformation insurance in the future of KRW 1,308,000 monthly insurance premium; and (c) submitted it to the victimized company.

However, the Defendant had been urged by H to pay the fees for the conclusion of the contract with the victimized company and agreed to buy insurance and pay monthly insurance premiums to the injured company, and there was no intention or ability to maintain the insurance contract normally even if the injured company received fees from the injured company.

The defendant deceivings the damaged company as above, and he acquired 7 million won from the damaged company as a commission fee in December 2010.

In addition, from September 2010 to May 201, the Defendant entered into a formal insurance contract with the victim company through the aforementioned method 33 times in total, such as the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 33 times, and obtained the total sum of 83,820,960 won from the victimized company as commission fees.

B. From January 2012 to January 2013, the Defendant served as an insurance designer at the victim I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) as an insurance agent, an insurance agent operated by J. (hereinafter “victim”).

On January 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased a life-based social integration insurance policy for KRW 97,500 of the monthly insurance premium by soliciting H to enter into an insurance contract on the ground of the same reason as paragraph (1); and (b) from the victimized Company, the Defendant purchased a life-based social integration insurance policy for KRW 97,500 of the monthly insurance premium.