손해배상(산)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 99,706,590 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 28, 2014 to January 12, 2017, and the following.
In fact, the defendant is a company that collects, transports, and processes paints, and the plaintiff is an employee belonging to the defendant.
On March 17, 2012, around 06:00 on March 17, 2012, while the Plaintiff was installed with garbage treatment truck by separating garbage stuffs from the Defendant’s transshipment room in a compressed machine, the Defendant’s employees cut off the truck about one meter to connect garbage stuffs to the garbage treatment truck, and the Plaintiff was faced with head on the floor by getting slick down on the floor made up of the steel plate.
(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff received medical treatment at D Hospital, E Hospital, Galim University Sym Hospital, F Hospital, etc. due to the instant accident, but is currently plant human resources.
[Grounds for recognition] No dispute exists, Gap 1-9, 12, 13, and 20 evidence, the result of physical appraisal commission, and the defendant is liable for damages arising from the occurrence of the purport of the entire argument and the limitation of liability, since the floor of the workplace is a steel plate, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for damages arising therefrom, since the accident of this case occurred due to negligence that the work executor has neglected to maintain the safety so as not to extinguish the water source while working.
The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant had engaged the Plaintiff to work without wearing safety shoes and safety caps. However, it is insufficient to find that the evidence No. 16 alone was insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff did not wear safety shoes and safety caps at the time of the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.
Rather, according to the evidence Nos. 2-4 (including paper numbers), the Plaintiff may recognize that the Plaintiff was out of the safety mother while putting the safety gun and the safety mother at the time of the instant accident.
While the Plaintiff asserted that Defendant C was faced with head on the floor while driving a truck, it is not enough to recognize the fact that the result of the physical examination commission for the head of Aju University Hospital is insufficient.