beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고합209

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of three and a half years;

2. At least 10 d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 4, 1990, the Seoul High Court sentenced a maximum of one year and six months of imprisonment to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and eight months of imprisonment to a special larceny attempted at the Seoul District Court on December 2, 1998. On July 15, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced a two-year imprisonment to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc., of Specific Crimes, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Taesung vocational training prison on October 2, 2012.

[criminal facts] On May 23, 2014, from around 19:00 to 21:00, the Defendant confirmed that there was no room in the house of the victim D located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and then intruded into the house above the victim’s window without correction, and attempted to steals up to 24 K 1,360,000 won in total, and 1,10,5,000 won in cultural product right of KRW 1,5,00 in cultural product right of KRW 4,00 in cash, one half of the half of the 1,360,000 in cultural product right of KRW 1,5,00 in cultural product right of KRW 10,00 in cash, and one and one of the 18 K K Twitbd and one of them, from that time to June 1, 2014, the Defendant attempted to steals the total market price of KRW 20,200 in attached Form 30,200.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, J, K, D, L, M,O, P, P, and Q;

1. A report on the results of field identification;

1. Records of seizure, list, etc., photographs of seized articles, and records of seizure;

1. Each of the following: At least 100 divers (proof No. 1), sirens (proof No. 2), small aftermaths (proof No. 3), stock farms (proof No. 4), and verification Mack (proof No. 5);

1. Investigation report (Report after confirming the time of sunset);

1. Previous records: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal records, each written judgment, the number and expropriation status of each individual, and previous dispositions and reports on confirmation;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the defendant in the judgment.