2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Therefore, it is not permitted to change the causes of each claim above.

3. The following facts are not disputed between the parties or may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the oral argument in Gap evidence No. 10.

① When maintaining the conditions of use for the 30-month LTE72 Tariff Rate 30 months, - the collection of the fare (ex, 990,000 won -660,000 won -330,000 won) - the difference in the changed fare system - the receipt of the terminal charge before the number transfer - the receipt of the total amount of the subscription fee, the oil depth, and the additional service (3 months) fee are not refunded. It is understood that the additional conditions are expected to be sent after the receipt * If there is any additional conditions, it is possible to send the SPs.com, and that the direct telephone communication is not possible.

However, according to the contents of the above compensation proposal presented by the defendant company, the payment of compensation by the defendant company was made by means of a discount rate against the customers who subscribed to the mobile communication service agreement of the defendant company, not the content that the defendant company would make a direct payment of cash to the customers. The compensation under the above compensation proposal by the defendant company can be realized specifically by submitting the documents that form the basis of calculating the amount of compensation to the defendant company by consenting thereto, requesting the compensation to the defendant company, requesting it, and submitting them to the defendant company, and at the same time there is no evidence supporting the fact that the defendants implemented it. In the lawsuit