1. On March 31, 2018, in the office room of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 306 (State) D, the Defendant would receive a loan of 6,3830,000 won from the victim E in total, including taxes, and KRW 11,00,000,000 in cash and KRW 21,50,000,000 won in the name of F, a wife of the Party by using the new bank Mcar loan, and purchase the remaining 6,383,000 won in the name of F, which is the wife of the Party.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the victim received the payment from the injured party and received the payment of the loan in the above F name, there was no intention or ability to purchase the diesel vehicle (G).

The Defendant received 10 million won on the same day from the damaged person to the company bank account in the name of the Defendant, 11 million won on April 2, 2018, and 11.5 million won on April 4, 2018, respectively, from the new bank around April 4, 2018, and received 63830,000 won on the pretext of the vehicle as the vehicle loan from the new bank around April 4, 2018, and acquired 96333,00 won on the aggregate.

2. Habitual gambling;

A. On March 31, 2018, the Defendant habitually divided 7,150,000 won of the vehicle purchase price of KRW 10,000,000,000 from the above E into “banker” and “flass” using a drum card, chips equivalent to KRW 10,000 to KRW 3,00,000,000, and chips equivalent to one, depending on the prescribed method, up to three copies of the maximum card, and thereafter, up to nine of the total number of card end points of which are high;

B. On April 4, 2018, the Defendant habitually carried out gambling in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph at least 16 million won out of the vehicle purchase price received from the said hotel E, on April 4, 2018.

Accordingly, the Defendant habitually gambling two times as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. E.