Since there was an intersection where a red light was operated, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop in the stop line immediately preceding the intersection and to prevent accidents by driving while due to other traffic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received the victim D, who had gone through a bicycle from the front side of the driver's plaza to the front side of the defendant's car at the front side of the defendant's car, without temporarily suspending prior to entering the intersection, and caused the victim to suffer damage to the incomplete number due to the 5-6 and 6-7 emergency warning signs that require approximately 14 weeks of treatment.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

A. On June 7, 2015, at around 10:59, the Defendant driven a car for CK3 K3 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with a private-distance intersection located on the 4-lane in the front city, e.g., the front city, the front city, the front city, along with the front city, (hereinafter “instant intersection”). On the other hand, the Defendant driven from the front city to the new apartment.

B. The intersection of this case is a private-distance intersection between the two-lanes and the two-lanes and the two-lanes from the center line of the Geum apartment, which connects the side road (road in the direction of the running of the Defendant vehicle) and the two-lanes from the center line, which walkes the side of the head head in the direction of the filial length square (three-lanes towards the center side of the head, and two-lanes in the opposite direction).

The instant intersection operated red flickerings in the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle driving.

(c)

In the instant intersection, the Defendant is right side on the side of the plaza, which is left side of the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle driving.