However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Interference with performing public duties;

A. At around 21:40 on December 12, 2020, the Defendant reported 112 that “A person, who ever ever ever ever on the front side of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was seated on the road A” and sent to the site, sent back to the scene from the security guards D of the police station C District of Gangdong-dong Police Station, the face of the said D is fright once again, and the bridge was taken several times, and as a result, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties from the above D and was arrested as a flagrant offender on the part of the patrol and moved to the district of C, the Defendant would immediately injure the said D.

The term "the head of the above D" in his / her hand has interfered with the handling of 112 reports by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

B. On December 12, 2020, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and arrived at a district group located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul to demand the patrol vehicle to leave the patrol vehicle. On December 12, 2020, the Defendant obstructed a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties with regard to evidence and custody of the current criminal, by taking the horses to be raised from the police officer F with a view to making him/her a drinking, and by making him/her a drinking at one time when he/she committed the crime, and thereby obstructing a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties with regard to evidence and custody of the current criminal.

2. On December 12, 2020, the Defendant, who damaged public goods, was arrested as a flagrant offender and was transferred to the C District District of the same police station, thereby damaging goods used by public offices so that the repair cost would be KRW 93,000, by walking the wind stack installed within the district unit of the same police station as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A criminal investigation report (verification of CCTV images for crime prevention at the scene) on the list of the police statements of the case 112 reported to D and F in the report of each police statement of the case 112, a criminal investigation report (the verification of patrol picture images) (the verification of CCTV images inside and outside the C district) (the application of a estimate under statutes governing the verification of CCTV images inside and outside

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment (this interferes with the performance of official duties)