When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The injured Defendant was aware of the Victim E (n, 36) and the Victim E (n, 36) that he/she had become aware of through the smartphone-making fluoring fluor on October 10, 2016 at the Seocho-si, Seocho-si, Do, Sincho-si, 2016, and while drinking alcohol.

“Along with the Defendant’s breath, the victim’s breath was 10 times at her hand, and the victim’s breath was bread by the Defendant’s scam, and the victim’s boomed with the Defendant’s scam, thereby inflicting injury on the victim, such as schills, tensions, etc.

2. On October 10, 2016, the Defendant, at around 20:25, who obstructed the performance of official duties, tried to return to the district for the receipt of the instant case after receiving a report on the occurrence of the injury as described in the preceding paragraph from the D Studio as described in the preceding paragraph at the front of the D Studio as described in the preceding paragraph, and the slope G belonging to the district unit of the first police station, which was called out to the site, was about to return to the district after taking on-site measures.

It is how the match will be left.

“Along with the Defendant’s drinking, the Defendant frightened the drinking of the said slope G, and assaulted the chest at least twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field, public safety and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and E;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the defendant and his defense counsel had a drunken condition at the time of committing the instant crime

In light of various circumstances, such as the background and means of the instant crime, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the instant crime, etc., as stated in the statement to the effect that he was in a state of mental or physical weakness or mental loss.