상해
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
On January 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 19:20 on the 19:20th day of the Cheongju-si, the Defendant: (b) was in front of the Donju-si, the passenger E (the age of 46) and the taxi rate, and (c) was infarbing the flab of the victim, and was in need of treatment for about 10 days for the victim.
Judgment
The victim E stated in an investigative agency that "a person was in dispute with the defendant as a problem of taxi rate, and the defendant was assaulted by the defendant, such as sprinking the head of the defendant after putting the defendant into the seat of the taxi, and sprinking him." However, the defendant was also suffering from injury to his head in the process of sprinking his head by sprinking him." However, this court stated that "at the time of the instant case, he was in dispute with the defendant as a problem of taxi rate, and it is difficult to recognize that the defendant was in the process of his head and sprinking his head after sprinking the defendant's seat, and it is hard to recognize that the defendant was in conflict with the defendant's own body due to his act, such as having his head and sprinking his head after sprinking him, and that the defendant was in conflict with the defendant's own body in the process of making his head and sprinking the defendant's act."
Therefore, it is true.