【Criminal Power】 On December 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment by the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Bribery), etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on September 18, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Suppression;

A. The Defendant from May 31, 2016 to the same year

6. up to 21st week, the victim E (the 47-year-old) who is the business owner of the telecom, was required to pay accommodation expenses on several occasions, and each time, the victim took a bath to the victim and 13-year-old speech and behavior, such as “I am 13 years of imprisonment with prison labor, I am 13 years of imprisonment,” and refused to pay accommodation expenses, and had the frighter victim, who was fright, concentrate on demanding the payment of accommodation expenses to pay the total amount of 540,000 won, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. The Defendant from June 21, 2016 to the same year.

7. up to April 1, 200, while administering to the “Gel” located in the “Gel”, the victim H (55 years of age) was required to pay accommodation expenses several times, and each time, the victim took a bath to the victim, and the victim took a bath at each time, “I am unable to do work at the Maure, I am dead, I am dead, I am dead, I am unable to pay accommodation expenses,” and refused to pay accommodation expenses, thereby having the victim frightened 230,000 won in total to claim accommodation charges, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. A special injury Defendant, at around 01:30 on July 3, 2016, took a bath to his/her employees without any particular reason in the “J” located in Sinju City, and took a bath from the Defendant K (the age of 41) of the victim K (the customer) who was the customer, and took a bath, she saw, “demblings, spacks, nbs, nbs, nbs, etc.,” and she takes a bath, and she takes a bath to the victim’s face and head, and the flabs of the victim’s head, and despite the fact that the said employees are only the Defendant, the victim was the victim.