2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all the facts of the crime and actively cooperates with the investigation authorities to avoid the same crime in the future, there are considerable amounts of penphones used for each of the crimes of this case, the defendant has been punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case again without being aware of during the repeated crime period of the same crime, there is a need for strict punishment in terms of social harm and danger of recidivism, and other various sentencing conditions in light of the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the situation after the crime, the age, character, and environment of the defendant, and other various sentencing conditions in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, and environment, it is difficult for the court below to find that the defendant's sentence against the defendant is too unfair. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per

However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected to add "1. Confiscation" and "the main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc." to the following:

.