beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.09.01 2016고단4169

사전자기록등위작등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant of the facts charged in the instant case work as an employee from September 2014 to June 2015 in Yangsan-si building C in Yangsan-si, and worked as a mobile phone sales and opening agency for the mobile phone sales.

person is a person.

1. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, such as electronic records, was written to inquire of the opening of a mobile phone at an online point.

Using a copy of the E's driver's license and the serial numbers of the "Aphone 5" mobile phone used before the above E, the mobile phone was opened in its name without the consent of the above E to receive the opening allowance from the SK Telecom Head Office.

Accordingly, the defendant had access to the computer network of the SK Telecom using a computer installed therein at the above date, time, and place, and then selected the " mobile phone opening," and made a clerical error in the name and resident registration number of the above E, and the mobile phone column in the personnel column.

“.” In the type column of contract, “General Use Contract”, “AS Submission For Guarantee Note”, “Exemption”, “OMD-APLE -LET”, “OMD-E 01, 2015” and “0 won” were respectively entered in the column of the amount of the principal and/or the amount of the penalty.

In the end, for the purpose of facilitating administrative affairs, the Defendant forged one file for entry by SK Telecom Mobile Call in the name of the above E, which is the electronic records of others regarding rights and duties.

2. The Defendant, such as electronic records of the above work company, sent one file to the employee in charge of application for the name in the name of the SK Telecom Co., Ltd., who is aware of the above work, at the above time, at the above place, via the above SK Telecom Computer Network, and exercised the above SK Telecom.

There is a fact that the defendant's assertion and defense counsel entered and transmitted the application file in the name of E, such as the construction work.

However, the defendant's 5 mobile phones used overseas by E are domestically used.