2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The plaintiff is a corporation that runs the manufacturing and wholesale and retail business of plastics, and the defendant is a corporation that runs the business of assembling buildings, etc.

B. The Defendant was supplied with polychlorates (hereinafter “instant product”) from the Plaintiff, and the amount of the Defendant’s unpaid product as of October 28, 2016 is KRW 2,493,986 (including value-added tax).

C. The Defendant constructed a roof of an access road to an apartment parking lot (hereinafter “instant roof”) using the instant product, but there was a defect that can be filled out on the roof of the instant case after construction (hereinafter “instant defect”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 2,493,986 as the price for the goods and the delay damages therefor.

B. The defendant's assertion 1) The defendant's assertion that the product of this case exceeds 6 meters is inevitable. Since the length of the product of this case used on the roof of this case exceeds 7.15 meters, the defect of this case was caused by the product of this case, and the plaintiff did not inform the defendant of construction directions while delivering the product of this case. Therefore, the plaintiff is liable for damages equivalent to the cost of repair due to the defect of this case, but the damage exceeds the cost of the product of this case, so the defendant cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim for the price of the product of this case. 2) The defendant is unable to respond to the plaintiff's claim for the price of the product of this case. The appraisal result of Gap's appraisal or video, the appraisal of the appraiser of the court of the trial, the result of the appraisal request for the appraiser C of the court of this case, and the result of the inquiry about D (hereinafter "D") of the court of this case's inquiry about the whole purport of the arguments.