To the extent that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, facts constituting a crime are recognized by rhyming

On June 21, 2007, the Defendant reported a marriage on D and June 21, 2007 and agreed to divorce, and reported a divorce on April 7, 201.

The defendant, on behalf of D, had the right to dispose of D houses owned by D, by pretending that D had the right to dispose of houses owned by D.

1. On April 27, 2011, the Defendant forged a private document with respect to a proxy certificate of the personal seal impression: (a) stated “A” on the proxy form for the certificate of the personal seal impression stored at the 3 Dong Office 3 Dong Office, the Defendant stated “A” on the proxy form for the certificate of the personal seal impression; (b) stated “D” in the delegating column; and (c) stated “D’s personal information on the delegating column; and (d) affixed a seal affixed to D’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), submitted a forged power of representation to the public official in charge who is not aware of the forgery and exercised it as if it were duly formed.

3. On May 16, 201, the Defendant forged a private document with respect to the power of representation for the registration of real estate, trading of 102, 306, 102, and 306, Glue House 102, and 306, which had been registered in the name of D in the F Office located in Si/Gu, on May 16, 201. Notwithstanding the fact that there was no delegation from D of authority to act as a proxy for the purchase and sale, the Defendant did not have a delegation of authority to act as proxy for the purchase and sale from D by using mix-type fences to indicate 102, Glue House 102, 306, 306, 306, 306, 306, 44.28 square meters of the indication of the building in exclusive ownership, H, 6721.