Defendant

B (Nam, 24 years old) and C (Nam, 22 years old) are branch personnel, and Defendant B or C has no relationship with Defendant A (Nam, 27 years old).

1. Defendant A’s assaulted Defendant A, around 02:06 on July 17, 2019, was viewed as “E” in the “E” toilet for the sake of B and its use, and the victim C, who was followed by it, was in his/her hand responsible for the Defendant A’s escape.

Accordingly, the defendant F, who saw the victim C as her hand, has breadddd the brea, and assaulted the victim by bucking at one time.

2. Defendant B’s assaulted Defendant B on July 17, 2019, at the entrance of the “H” parking lot located in Gu-si G on the ground that there was a fighting such as the foregoing paragraph 1, and assaulted the victim A by drinking and drinking out to the victim A on the ground that there was a fighting such as the foregoing paragraph 1.

However, the facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, since victims expressed their intention not to punish the Defendants, all of the instant prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.