2. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for seventeen years;

3. The knife;

A. Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (A) part of the Defendant case A) Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) were in a state of lacking the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a large amount of drinking and mental disorder based on family capacity at the time of the instant crime.

B) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (20 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable. 2) In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s part of the request for attachment order did not have any criminal punishment prior to the instant crime; (b) the background of the instant crime; (c) the Defendant’s tendency and living attitude toward the Defendant; and (d) the result of evaluating the Defendant’s risk of recidivism, it is difficult to view that the Defendant has a risk of again

In addition, even if it is recognized that the defendant is dangerous to repeat a crime, the period of attachment for 10 years is too excessive and unfair.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the record as to the defendant's claim of mental disability of the defendant 1 in part of the defendant's case, the fact that the defendant was in a drunken state at the time of the crime of this case

However, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the method and method of the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, in particular, the Defendant committed the instant murder after a considerable period of time after the Defendant boarded the taxi operated by the victim, and the Defendant was driving the cab of the victim after the instant murder, and abandoned the body by moving the victim’s body to a rare place, etc., it is not deemed that the Defendant had the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking at the time of the instant crime.

In addition, there is a person who suffers from mental illness or has received a new forest from among the relatives of the defendant.