A. As to Defendant B’s share 6,300/21,875, Defendant C1.

A. On September 30, 1989, the Plaintiff indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, and the said Defendants completed the registration of co-ownership transfer on the grounds of inheritance of property on September 30, 1989. Thereafter, the J died on November 11, 1990 and succeeded to the pertinent shares of the said real estate by F and his/her children, G and H. The Plaintiff died on March 3, 1993 by the said Defendants as their children and F, G, and H, the heir of the said Defendants, and F, H, the heir of the said shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and thereafter, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she purchased each of the above real estate from Defendant D, and that he/she purchased the said real estate on December 2, 1997.

(b) Defendant C and E: Article 208(3)2 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by a person who is deemed as having been a person) of the applicable provisions of Acts; Defendant D: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by public notice);

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The fact that the Plaintiff purchased 6,300/21,875 shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 listed in the separate sheet No. 1 on December 2, 1997 by Defendant B from Defendant B on December 2, 1997 is not a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B, and the Defendant B is liable to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for shares of 6,300/21,875 shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list as to the Plaintiff

B. The Plaintiff asserted that on December 2, 1997, the Plaintiff purchased the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, 1997 from Defendant B. However, the Plaintiff’s primary claim cannot be accepted solely by the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff. 2) If the nature of the source of possession right of the real estate in the determination of the conjunctive claim is not clear, the possessor is in good faith, peace, and public performance pursuant to Article 197(1) of the Civil Act.