2. The crime of this case is a systematic and planned crime of defraudation by abusing the system of lending employee's house lease fund to homeless workers by using the relevant documents, such as a false certificate of employment and a lease agreement, and the method of crime or crime is very bad.

The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime.

Damage has not been repaid.

There is no special change in circumstances that would be different from the original judgment in the first instance.

In full view of the above circumstances and other factors, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee (type 2 (type 100 million won or more, less than KRW 500 million) and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.