If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On May 24, 2013, from around 06:04 to around 06:34, the Defendant: (a) was in the Yongsan-gu Seoul District District District District of Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; and (b) the Defendant was able to take the fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor of the Defendant’s fluor

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do139, Apr. 1, 20

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;