When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant leased approximately KRW 2,700 on the basis of a common cemetery to the D Village Association (hereinafter “Treatment Construction”) at a price that would be inappropriate for approximately 2,700 square meters in consultation with four residents without having gone through a village meeting, even though the D Village Association concluded a lease agreement with Treatment Construction Co., Ltd. through a village meeting, and thus, such a lease agreement is null and void as it is in violation of Article 276 of the Civil Act.

On March 13, 2015, on the road of the Ulsan-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, three banners stating “the real estate residents who entered into a contract in a lock room oppose” were distributed in writing stating the contents “,” and damaged the honor of the victim E by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendant: (a) distributed false statements at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) above; and (b) posted three placards with false contents; and (c) interfered with the work related to the marine leisure in the victim D Village Conference.

Summary of Evidence

Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) and Article 313 of the Criminal Act, Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act, Article 70(1)2, and Article 50 of the former part of the Criminal Act, Article 70 of the Criminal Act, Article 62 of the Criminal Act, concerning the criminal facts subject to an investigation report (Attachment of the list of participants at the meeting on January 22, 2015), the applicable criminal facts subject to an investigation report (including documents related to newspaper advertisements and business plans), the applicable criminal facts subject to the application of statutes against the defendant in some of the defendant's statutory statements by the prosecution against the defendant in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect's suspect who made a statement by the police against the defendant in some of the defendant, the community meeting record of the police's written statements by the defendant against H, each written record of attendance at the meeting of the police in the interrogation of the suspect.