beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.08.24 2015가합9747

대여금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 26.4 million to the Plaintiff, as well as 6% per annum from October 9, 2015 to August 24, 2016.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On March 11, 2003, the Plaintiff is a person who completed each business registration with the trade name D for the purpose of leasing real estate and selling new construction of a building to the head of Ansan Tax Office on March 20, 2004. < Amended by Act No. 7183, Mar. 11, 2003>

The defendant is the representative director of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “E”) established for the purpose of parcelling-out agency business.

In around 202, the Plaintiff newly built the C commercial building (hereinafter referred to as “C commercial building”) on the ground level of the first floor and the fifth floor above the ground level on the land level other than F in 2002, the king-si and three lots of land.

On March 2003, the Plaintiff entered into a sales agency contract with E for C shopping families.

In around 2005, the Plaintiff newly built D shop on the ground level 2, 6th above ground level and 40th below ground level on Pyeongtaek-si G ground level (hereinafter “instant shop”).

On January 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a sales agency contract with E for the instant commercial buildings by setting the period from the date of concluding the contract to December 31, 2015.

(2) The Plaintiff and E concluded a sales agency contract for the remainder which has not been sold in the first sales agency contract among the commercial buildings in this case (hereinafter “the second sales agency contract”). The Plaintiff and E amended and amended the first sales agency contract, and extended the sales agency period to March 31, 2006. On November 1, 2010, the Plaintiff concluded a sales agency contract between E and E as of October 31, 201, and the last settlement date of the sales agency fee is as of October 31, 2012, with the payment date of the sales agency fee as of October 31, 2012 (hereinafter “the second sales agency contract”). The Defendant’s loan certificate, etc. for the Plaintiff is unsold in lots 108,11,112, and 113,000 won at the time of the delivery of the substitute goods to D in lots.

On November 2005, the defendant prepared and rendered the following loan certificates (hereinafter referred to as "the first loan certificate") to the plaintiff.

A. 30 million won on a loan certificate.