손해배상(기)
1. The part regarding the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;
2. The defendant of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party.
1. According to the records of this case as to the legitimacy of the appeal for subsequent completion, when the complaint of this case against the defendant was sent in W, Ansan-gu, Sinsan-si, where the defendant had his domicile on his resident registration, the court of first instance rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff (appointed party) on October 22, 2013 after serving the complaint of this case and the notice of the date of pleading by public notice, and served the plaintiff (appointed party) on October 23, 2013. The above certified copy of the judgment also served by public notice and served the service on the defendant on October 23, 2013. The defendant became aware that the judgment of first instance became final and conclusive on March 31, 2014. According to the above facts, according to the above facts, the defendant could not observe the period of appeal due to any cause not attributable to himself, and thus, the defendant raised the appeal of this case from March 31, 2014 to April 20, 2014.
2. The facts below the basic facts may be acknowledged by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to the statements in Gap evidence 2-1, 2-1, 17-1, 2, 3, and 4.
Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “B”) borrowed the name of the Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “C”) and operated the PP participation event in the building located in Ansan-si X of the members of Ansan-si, and the Defendant operated the P Administration Office in the same office as B.
B. B was delegated by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) with the issuance of visa to their friendships, and in preparation for the P traveler’s disadvantage because they did not depart from the Republic of Korea within the period of stay after entering the Republic of Korea, they received money in the name of the security deposit for return as shown in the following table.
On the other hand, B agreed that when the plaintiffs' friendship return to their home country, they shall return the deposit.