Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Defendant

A As the representative director of a corporation B, a person who acts on behalf of the business owner with respect to the prevention of industrial accidents of its employees, and Defendant B is a business owner who runs a construction waste disposal business with 15 full-time workers at the time of strike.

The business owner shall take measures necessary for the prevention of danger at a place where workers might fall down in the course of work.

1. The Defendant did not take measures to prohibit the entry of workers, such as installing fences, at the end of a concrete recycling machine, which is highly likely to fall down by his/her workers, on six occasions, at the end of a concrete recycling machine (hereinafter referred to as the “bring screen”). As a result, around 16:40 on February 12, 2015, the number of employees F of Company B was exceeded six times after entering the end of a consortium, and the treatment was conducted on the part of the worker F of Company B, at around 6:40 on May 17, 2015, due to a disaster, such as a climatic flacing, external he/shed, and waste collection, and caused the death of the worker at around 20:41 on May 17, 2015.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed the above offenses in relation to the Defendant’s business at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to disaster investigation reports, written confirmations, reports on occurrence of a serious accident, and submission of a written opinion on investigation of a serious accident (including attached letters);

1. Defendant A: Articles 66-2 and 23(3) of the Industrial Safety and Health Act; Articles 71, 66-2 and 23(3) of the Act on Industrial Safety and Health; and Articles 71, 66-2 and 23(3) of the Act on Industrial Safety and Health;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.