except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 17, 2015, at around 21:27, the Defendant took a bath to the effect that the circumstances belonging to the D District Unit of the Busan East Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving 112 reports, are about the reporter, and personal information is identified, the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by reason of the following: (a) on the ground that the circumstances belonging to the D District Unit of the Busan East Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving 112 reports; and (b) on the ground that he was aware of personal information.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of the interrogation protocol of the accused

1. The application of statutes to the E and F of each statement of statement and investigation report (on the spot dispatch status, etc.);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] The execution of imprisonment shall be postponed by taking into account the following: (a) the mitigation area (one to eight months) [Special Mitigation] of the obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor [decision of the sentence] of a fine four times due to violence; (c) there is no less punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties; (d) the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not more severe; and (e) the degree of interference