대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that it is difficult to believe that the plaintiff's remittance amount is not possible or refused to attend even if the plaintiff requests the plaintiff to attend as a witness for the confirmation of facts stated in the confirmation document, except for the evidence Nos. 15, 16, and 17 (written confirmation of facts) additionally submitted in the court of first instance (written confirmation of facts) (written evidence Nos. 15 and 16). The evidence No. 17 is merely the purport that the plaintiff Eul (the defendant and the name of the plaintiff) came to know after the plaintiff's assertion, and it is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's withdrawal is a loan to the defendant) and the part of the judgment of first instance and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are identical to the reasons for the judgment of first instance.
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.