except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant driven Oral Daba on April 10, 2015, and driven the crosswalk in front of the E convenience point D in Daegu-gu Seo-gu, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 5 km per hour from the e-line room to the e-line basin, and proceeded at a speed of about 5 km per hour.

Since there is a pedestrian crossing installed, the driver of the Oral ba shall not cross the road by driving the Oral ba in a case where it is likely to obstruct the normal passage of pedestrians, and even if crossing the road by using the crosswalk is permitted, he has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while driving a crosswalk by driving it on the part of his negligence and driving it on the crosswalk in the same direction, received the left ambel of the victim F (the age of 65) who crossed along the crosswalk from the front side of the same direction, in front of the Defendant’s ambane.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as kneee-magne, knee-magrashing on the left-hand side, which requires treatment for about seven weeks by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;