When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who manages a building located in Busan Jin-gu B.

On March 2017, the Defendant leased the first floor of the above building to the victim C in KRW 3 million per rent, and the victim sold new shoes, clothing, etc. at the same place from that time to June 2018.

On July 2018, the Defendant agreed to receive KRW 1,00,000 per month on the condition that the Defendant performed funeral services in front of the above building and used the first floor warehouse of the above building on the condition that the Defendant terminated the above lease contract. On August 2018, the victim continued to use the said warehouse in a state where the Defendant requested the Defendant to compensate for damages incurred to the goods stored in the said warehouse at the cost of the horse around August 2018.

On December 5, 2018, the Defendant was in front of the warehouse of the first floor above the above building, and was in possession of a prior reproduction of the victim so that the Defendant was unlocked, opened the locks of the above warehouse, and intruded into the structure managed by the victim against the victim’s will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and C;

1. 피고인에 대한 각 경찰 피의자신문조서(일부) ◈ 기록에 의하면, 피고인이 C으로부터 열쇠를 건네받은 사실, C은 피고인에게 복사를 허락하거나 피고인이 복사할 것으로는 생각지도 못했다고 증언하였던 점(피고인도 임의로 복사한 사실을 인정하고 있다), 당시 지하 1층 창고에는 상당히 많은 피해자 측 물건이 있었던 것으로 보이는 점, 피고인이 공사 등의 사정으로 지하 출입이 필요한 경우, 피해자 측으로부터 열쇠를 교부받을 수 있었던 것으로 보이는 반면 복사한 열쇠로 피고인의 언제든지 지하 창고를 출입하도록 허락할 것으로 보이지 아니하는 점에서 피고인의 판시 범죄사실은 충분히 인정되므로, 이에 반하는 피고인 및 변호인의 주장 내지 변소는...