However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-rat vehicle.

On October 7, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver’s license on October 7, 2014, and proceeded at a speed of about 35 km from the west to the west, along the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the E-owned station located in E-U.D., the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of about 35 km from the west to the west.

At the same time, it was difficult to secure the view due to the opening, and the traffic control was not performed, and only a shooting range intersection operating only with the yellow light signal apparatus, thus, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely check whether the driver of the motor vehicle is engaged in the operation of the motor vehicle by reducing the speed prior to the entry into the intersection or temporarily suspending the right and the right and the right and the right of the intersection, and whether the entry of another motor vehicle into the intersection

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded along as is, while driving the said intersection from the JC to the Do Office, received the front part of the victim F (year 76) driving G 49CC in front of the left side of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, through occupational negligence above, caused the death of the victim F in the I Hospital located in Sinpo City H on October 7, 2014, by multi-long-term corrosion, etc. Around 12:05, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim J (L, 67 years of age) who was on board the back seat of the Yatoba, and caused approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the victim J (J, who was on board the back seat of the Y).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. The death certificate to F and each diagnosis certificate to J;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. The sentencing criteria shall not apply inasmuch as the application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as traffic accidents and photographs, is in a commercial concurrent relationship;

1. Article 3(1), proviso of Article 3(2)7 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of occupational or bodily injury), Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;